Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Relevant training and a supportive culture for staff, but the manager covering care shifts and staffing shortages disrupt oversight and care continuity."
Whilst we found no evidence of harm the concerns, we identified had not been fully risk assessed and mitigated against to ensure people's safety. These concerns amounted to a breach of regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment).
Staff told us they felt supported, and the registered manager was visible in the service. One member of staff shared, 'This type of job is not for everyone. But I love my job, I can't think of anything currently that could do with improvement other than the staffing situation.'
Staffing challenges including personnel changes, retention and recruitment had impacted on continuity of care and there were instances of people's routines being affected. A member of staff said, 'There's not always enough staff on each shift...'
Staff said the training they had received was relevant... Specialist learning disability and autism training was provided. This included Non-Abusive Psychological and Physical Intervention (NAPPI) and The Oliver McGowan Mandatory Training on Learning disability and autism.
The registered manager's responsibilities were too great and this had impacted on their oversight of the service. In addition to covering care shifts at Woody Point they supported the provider's other managers nearby, who were new to the role.
Per 2020 comprehensive inspection: People were supported to take part in activities of their choice... We observed staff taking people out on their own to visit places they liked in the community.
The manager has to cover care shifts and support other homes, so spends less time overseeing and supporting the team here.
To maintain safe staffing levels the registered manager had been covering care shifts instead of overseeing the service. The registered manager's responsibilities were too great and this had impacted on their oversight of the service.
High turnover and vacancies leave you short staffed at times, disrupting routines and meaning new staff take time to learn residents well.
Staffing turnover had at times disrupted the quality of the service people received. Staff shared examples of inconsistencies including being stretched which resulted in changes to people's routines... When they are new it's still hard because they don't know the job/service users fully yet.
Some risks to residents like wandering off unsupervised are not fully checked and fixed yet.
The service had not fully considered and mitigated the risks for 1 person that lived in the service who was at risk of leaving the service unsupervised and of climbing fence panels.
AI Generated
Last inspected: August 2023
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp