Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Supportive culture and regular training, but sloppy recruitment, no activities and safety breaches hold it back."
The service was in breach of regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and had failed to notify CQC of notifications as required by legislation.
Staff described a supportive and open culture. They spoke positively about the management team, said they felt valued, and were proud to work at Woodley Hall.
Recruitment and staff management processes were not always robust. Gaps or missing information on application forms were not consistently followed up at interview.
Staff received regular support, supervision and development. Records of staff supervision were maintained on an online system and included both regular one-to-one supervision and additional sessions on specific topics.
The service was in breach of the regulation relating to good governance. Whilst audits had been completed, they had not identified any of the concerns raised during this assessment.
People did not have consistent access to meaningful activities. On the ground floor, we observed people left unattended for long periods with no engagement, and no activities were provided on either day of the assessment.
Recruitment is sloppy with missing checks and unclear hiring processes, so you might end up working with poorly vetted colleagues.
Recruitment and staff management processes were not always robust. Gaps or missing information on application forms were not consistently followed up at interview. One staff member recruited under the Certificate of Sponsorship scheme had documents managed centrally, with no apparent involvement from the registered manager.
Safeguarding concerns weren't always reported to the regulator, and infection control has issues like improper mask use.
There was not an effective system in place to ensure safeguarding alerts, as required by the provider’s registration, were reported to the CQC. We also observed staff wearing masks under their chins, which is not in line with IPC guidance.
No activities or engagement programme means the job is mostly routine tasks like helping with eating and dressing with no variety.
People did not have consistent access to meaningful activities. On the ground floor, we observed people left unattended for long periods with no engagement, and no activities were provided on either day of the assessment.
AI Generated
Last inspected: May 2018
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp