Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Approachable visible managers and staff feeling valued in an open culture, but basic activities and irregular supervisions hold it back."
Medicines were managed safely; however, some people’s PRN protocols were not person-centred. Risk assessments had been completed and regularly reviewed, however, we noted some inconsistencies in peoples care records where information was conflicting.
Staff told us there was an open culture and they felt valued and respected by the management team. Staff surveys had been carried out and the latest results showed high staff satisfaction levels.
The staff rota showed that staffing levels were maintained in accordance with the dependency tool. Overall, staff told us they felt there were enough of them on duty.
Training records showed staff had completed training. Although annual staff appraisals were carried out, staff told us supervisions took place when the staff member or the supervisor had something to discuss, rather than as an opportunity of one-to-one time.
Staff told us the management team were visible and accessible. All staff told us the management team were approachable and easy to talk to.
Activities took place during the two days on site; we saw some activities were tailored to people’s individual preferences, but not all. The staff member responsible for activities was new in post and told us of plans they had for future meaningful engagement.
The role is mostly routine personal care with only basic activities like singing since the activities lead is new and plans are just starting.
Activities took place during the two days on site; we saw some activities were tailored to people’s individual preferences, but not all. The staff member responsible for activities was new in post and told us of plans they had for future meaningful engagement.
Supervisions only happen if there's something specific to discuss, not regular chats about wellbeing or development.
staff told us and records we looked at showed that supervisions took place when the staff member or the supervisor had something to discuss, rather than as an opportunity of one-to-one time with a senior member of staff to discuss general well-being. The registered manager told us they were reviewing how staff supervisions were carried out.
Some as-needed medication plans aren't personalised and don't list steps to try before giving meds, plus some records contradict each other.
some people’s PRN protocols were not person-centred... we noted some inconsistencies in peoples care records where information was conflicting.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp