Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Adequate staffing levels and enjoyable activities, but no permanent manager and staff not feeling supported during incidents hold it back."
one relative told us they had not been informed of incidents regarding their relative at the service... During the inspection we found one person had not been fully involved in supporting them to manage their own risks.
some staff told us they had not consistently felt supported following recent times at the service... Staff told us that during recent times they had not felt supported by leaders during a time where there were a higher number of incidents at the service.
staffing levels met the service’s assessed staffing dependency levels, and staff told us they felt these staffing levels met people’s needs. Most relatives told us they felt staffing levels met people’s needs.
some staff told us they felt more training was required in supporting people who experienced distressed behaviours. One staff member told us training should be individualised to a person’s needs. We found there had been a high number of safeguarding incidents at the service regarding supporting people with behaviours of distress. This meant the training available to support staff managing behaviours of distress may not have been effective.
At the time of the inspection, there was no registered manager in post. The service was had oversight from the operations manager, along with managers from different services within the company, and the deputy manager.
People told us they were able to go out as much as they wanted to, and enjoyed the activities which they took part in. People had individualised activity timetables if they wanted these.
No permanent manager in place, so other managers from different services oversee things and staff say it leads to confusing changes.
The service did not have a registered manager at the time of the inspection... One staff member told us, “I don’t think it’s an ideal plan, they are from different services, trying to help, some things they are bringing along don’t really work. They are doing a good job, we have to come in and ask what’s happening now, as there are lots of changes.”
Staff did not always feel supported by leaders during recent tough times with more incidents.
Staff told us that during recent times they had not felt supported by leaders during a time where there were a higher number of incidents at the service. One staff member told us, “That time was really distressing. We feel we were not that supported, [leaders were] telling us to do this and that, but they weren’t looking at our needs.”
Training on handling behaviours of distress is not effective enough, as there have been lots of related safeguarding incidents.
We found there had been a high number of safeguarding incidents at the service regarding supporting people with behaviours of distress. This meant the training available to support staff managing behaviours of distress may not have been effective.
AI Generated
Last inspected: June 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp