Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff feel well supported with plenty of activities and adequate staffing, but lack training in key areas like diabetes and tube feeding, plus unclear risk plans."
Risk assessments lacked clear information in some cases... one person... high risk of developing pressure ulcers and their care plan only contained brief instructions... gaps in repositioning charts.
Staff told us they felt well treated and supported in their roles... a staff member told us, 'That's the reason I've been here for a while.' Another... felt 'supported and listened to'.
We observed staffing numbers were adequate, and people, relatives, visiting professionals and staff shared the same view. Comments... 'There are plenty of staff.'
staff had not had training in some areas relevant to their work... such as diabetes, PEG feeding (feeding tube), swallowing difficulties, stoma care and Parkinson’s disease... Staff were also not trained in learning disability and autism.
There were shortfalls in the governance of the service, including the effectiveness of quality assurance systems. The existing quality assurance system had not identified the issues we found.
The service organised a series of group activities as well as individual sessions, led by activity coordinators... arts and crafts session... relatives’ feedback... 'a lot of activities going on, and a church service'
Staff lack training on key needs like diabetes, tube feeding, stoma bags, swallowing issues, and mandatory learning disability and autism training, so you may not feel ready for some residents.
they had not had training in some areas relevant to their work or the needs of the people using the service, such as diabetes, PEG feeding (feeding tube), swallowing difficulties, stoma care and Parkinson’s disease... Staff were also not trained in learning disability and autism.
Risk plans for pressure sores and other health issues often lack clear details on what to do and how often, leaving more guesswork in daily care.
Risk assessments lacked clear information... high risk of developing pressure ulcers... did not specify how often or in what manner... gaps in repositioning charts... clear instructions for staff to manage these risks effectively were lacking.
Managers' quality checks miss problems and do not always act fast on staff reports or audit findings, so issues pile up over time.
the existing quality assurance system had not identified the issues we found... Where audits had identified concerns, prompt action was not always taken... Maintenance issues reported by staff were not always actioned, indicating a lack of management oversight.
AI Generated
Last inspected: June 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp