Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff feel supported by managers with a positive culture, innovative programmes and strong safety, but uncertain team stability and no specialist training are drawbacks."
We were assured that the provider was keeping people, visitors and staff safe from catching and spreading infections through their processes and audits in place.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: Staff told us that they enjoyed working at the service and they felt supported by the registered manager.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: A review of staffing levels showed there were enough staff to support people with safe care.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: Staff were supported via supervision and yearly appraisal sessions with their line managers. Staff skills and knowledge was kept up-to-date via a programme of continual training.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: Staff spoke highly of the registered manager, telling us how much they felt supported in their role.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: The provider had introduced a pilot scheme into the service called 'myhomehelper'. This was a 'visual display computer tablet' that had been designed to support people with their independence.
Staffing levels are enough to meet basic needs, but no details on team stability or agency use to make workloads easy.
A review of staffing levels showed there were enough staff to support people with safe care. Per 2018 comprehensive inspection
Training is regular with supervisions, but no specialist courses or funded qualifications for career growth.
Staff received regular training to support them with the necessary skills to care for people. Per 2018 comprehensive inspection
AI Generated
Last inspected: March 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp