Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Strong leadership, stable staffing with good retention, and a supportive team culture, although activities are basic and lack variety."
People were protected from the risk of abuse... People's risks were assessed... Safe medicines management processes were in place. Staff had supported people to have their medicines reviewed and reduced in line with the STOMP campaign.
Staff told us their views and opinions were welcomed and encouraged. There were regular staff meetings and supervision sessions... Staff described their relationship with other staff members as their 'critical friend' which enabled them all to reflect and evaluate practices.
There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people's needs... Staff were allocated into smaller teams who worked on a rolling two week rota. This enabled consistency of staffing and good team working. There was an established staff team with good retention.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: The staff training programme in place was comprehensive and tailored... Staff received individual supervision every two to three months... Topics included positive behavioural support, learning disabilities and autism awareness.
The registered manager and staff were clear about their roles and responsibilities. Staff reported any concerns appropriately and the registered manager took accountability for the service. Relatives described the manager as 'very good, very warm and encouraging' and 'professional, friendly, helpful'.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: People were supported to do activities they were interested in... such as college, trampoline club, swimming, personal trainer, art therapist. Most relatives felt people had access to sufficient suitable activities although one relative felt the service could do more.
Only basic activities like college trips, swimming and art sessions, no dedicated coordinator or specialist programmes to add variety to the working day.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: People were supported to do activities they were interested in. Most relatives felt people had access to sufficient suitable activities although one relative felt the service could do more for their family member in relation to this.
AI Generated
Last inspected: May 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp