Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Hands-on management, close-knit supportive team and strong safety practices, but staffing lacks low agency use and training misses specialist courses."
Staff understood safeguarding, risks and how to report; regular risk assessments, medicine checks and learning from incidents like falls.
Staff felt supported within their working environment and part of a close knit team; stable team that got on well.
Staff told us staffing levels were sufficient for the needs of people at the home; people had timely support from staff.
Staff were supported with training that was regularly reviewed and updated; new staff supervised during induction.
Staff described the registered manager as 'hands on' and supported staff through feedback and supervision; communication described as open and honest.
People supported to participate in range of activities including art interests, gentle exercise, and intergenerational links with local children.
Enough staff to give timely care, but no details on easy workloads or using hardly any agency workers.
Staff we spoke with told us staffing levels were sufficient for the needs of people at the home.
Standard training that's kept up to date plus induction supervision, but no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff were supported with training that was regularly reviewed and updated by the registered manager. New staff were supervised during their induction and provided with feedback.
Some activities like art, exercise and kids visits add variety, but no dedicated coordinator or special therapy programmes.
People were supported to participate in a range of different activities. We saw people pursuing art interests as well as taking part in gentle exercise. A volunteer described... links with local children.
AI Generated
Last inspected: April 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp