Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff feel supported with improved teamwork and staffing levels, but split manager time has led to weak safety oversight and risk management."
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment... risk assessments were not always updated or lacked essential detail... Medicines management systems were not always effective in keeping people safe.
Staff spoke positively about working at the service and generally felt supported in their roles. Some staff spoke of issues in the staff team earlier in the year, but most felt things had improved, and staffing levels and team work were much better.
Most staff were positive about the current staffing levels in the home. Some staff referred to staffing levels being an issue earlier in the year but said this was now much better.
Staff received training relevant to their role,however some additional training was required to ensure staff were skilled to identify potential skin damage. We also found that although staff had been trained to manage Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tubes (PEG) they had not had their competency assessed.
Governance systems were in place which identified where improvements were needed, however, we found some improvements had not been made promptly. This was partly due to the registered manager’s time being split between The Laurels and another of the providers locations.
People were supported to take part in a range of activities in the home and community. However, there was limited reference to future planning, or consideration of the longer-term aspirations of each person.
The manager splits time between this home and another so oversight of risks and records has slipped leaving gaps new staff might miss.
the registered manager’s time being split between The Laurels and another of the providers locations. Although the provider had put systems in place to cover the management of the home in the interim, the quality of recording and review of information relevant to people’s care and safety had deteriorated.
Risk assessments for choking, falls and skin injuries are not always up to date or detailed enough and daily food prep records are spotty.
Risks relating to constipation, choking, and monitoring of people’s skin were not sufficiently robust. Where risk assessments were in place, some were overdue review. Daily notes completed by staff did not always describe how food was being prepared for those at risk of choking.
Staff training covers basics but competencies are not checked for PEG tube meds and more training needed for spotting skin damage.
although staff had been trained to manage Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tubes (PEG) they had not had their competency assessed, as per the providers policy. This included competencies around managing people’s medicines administered via a PEG... some additional training was required to ensure staff were skilled to identify potential skin damage.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2018
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp