Last updated: 9 February 2026
"A supportive management team and family-like culture stand out, but safety risks are not always properly assessed and staff medication skills lack regular checks."
Risks to people's safety and welfare were not always assessed appropriately... no evidence staff had their competency checked annually [for medication].
One staff member told us, 'It's a small home, it's like one big family. You can be close to people but still be professional. I love working here'.
There were enough staff to ensure people received safe care. Safe recruitment procedures were in place.
Staff received appropriate training, a plan was in place to ensure training was kept up to date. Staff received supervision.
People spoke highly of the management team who they said was approachable and supportive. Staff were supported and felt supported by the management team.
The provider employed an activity coordinator who arranged a programme of activities... one day we play dominos, other days she will have us doing exercises in our chairs.
Risk plans do not always cover everything needed, like personal escape plans for emergencies, and there are no regular checks on staff skills for giving medication.
Risks to people's safety and welfare were not always assessed appropriately. For example, there were no personal emergency evacuation plans... no evidence staff had their competency checked annually.
Staffing levels are enough to get by but there is no information about stable teams, low agency use or easy workloads.
There were enough staff to ensure people received safe care.
Only standard training and supervision with no specialist courses or funded qualifications mentioned.
Staff received appropriate training, a plan was in place to ensure training was kept up to date.
AI Generated
Last inspected: April 2020
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp