Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Strong training, empowering culture and engaging activities, but prolonged lack of a registered manager and missed safeguarding reports hold it back."
People and relatives we spoke with told us they felt the home was safe. Staff followed processes for medicines and risks were assessed.
Staff we spoke with felt empowered to raise concerns directly with the manager or deputy manager.
There were enough staff available to support people. People told us they felt that staffing levels were fine.
There was a training programme in place and staff were supported to gain nationally recognised qualifications in care.
The manager had been in post for four months and was going through the process of registration with us. Prior to this, the service had been without a registered manager for nine months.
Activity co-coordinators were employed to lead on this support both in and outside of the home. We saw people playing group games such as bingo and had been taken out.
The home had no permanent manager for nine months until recently, and the new one is still registering while also running another home.
Prior to this, the service had been without a registered manager for nine months. The manager was also responsible for an adjoining sister home.
Staffing is adequate but nothing special, with enough staff so people don't wait long but no info on keeping staff long-term.
There were enough staff available to support people. People told us they felt that staffing levels were fine.
Staff did not always spot or report minor fights between residents as safeguarding issues.
staff had not recognised that minor physical conflict between people should be reported internally and externally.
AI Generated
Last inspected: December 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp