Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Supportive management, strong safety practices and good training, although staffing levels sometimes dipped requiring agency cover."
Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding responsibilities; robust medicines management with regular audits; incidents and accidents routinely reviewed with reflective practice and learning shared with the team.
There was a person-centred culture within the service; staff worked effectively together as a team and one staff member said 'They are like my family, they are like us, so we treat them equally'.
There was some concern that minimum staffing levels had not always been maintained over few weeks prior to the inspection; some agency staff were being used to ensure safe staffing levels.
Staff told us that they received good ongoing training which helped them to provide high quality support; in addition to mandatory courses staff were given training in areas such as epilepsy and positive behaviour management.
People spoke positively about the registered manager and had confidence in how the service was being run; staff described them as 'very supportive' and the manager promoted good values and led by example.
People were supported to engage in preferred activities including hydrotherapy, music, attending church, going to local cafes, art classes and gardening; on the day of inspection each person accessed the community individually.
Staff numbers fell short some weeks before the inspection, so they used agency workers to cover shifts.
There was some concern that minimum staffing levels had not always been maintained over few weeks prior to the inspection, however there was evidence of ongoing recruitment... Some agency staff were being used to ensure safe staffing levels.
AI Generated
Last inspected: March 2020
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp