Working at The Belvedere
Horseshoe Lane, Stockport, SK9 7QP
Operated by Maria Mallaband Properties (5) Limited
41 bedsNursing homes
Workplace Score
3.9/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 3.9/10
Key Finding
"Staff feel supported with enough people on shift, but no registered manager in place and little activities hold it back."
Safety & Risk
3/10
✕
Some environmental safety and maintenance checks were overdue... we further identified some issues around the accurate recording of checks of people in their bedrooms.
Staff Culture
5/10
!
There had been some uncertainty due to changes in management. However, overall staff felt supported as a staff team and understood the expectations of their roles.
Staffing Levels
5/10
!
Overall, there were enough staff to meet people's care needs... Agency staff were used to provide some of this support.
Training & Dev
4/10
!
Some training needs had been identified and were being addressed by the provider in relation to nutritional risks.
Management
2/10
✕
There was no registered manager in post. The previous registered manager had left, and a peripatetic manager was providing support. A new manager had been recruited but had not yet applied to register.
Programmes
3/10
✕
During the inspection the home was quiet with little activity taking place. (However, the activities coordinator was absent during the inspection).
Points to consider
No permanent manager in place, only temporary support from a peripatetic manager while the new one gets registered.
There was no registered manager in post. The previous registered manager had left, and a peripatetic manager was providing support. A new manager had been recruited but had not yet applied to register.
Little activities happening so the role is mostly routine personal care like meals and helping people get dressed.
During the inspection the home was quiet with little activity taking place. (However, the activities coordinator was absent during the inspection).
Some gaps in staff training especially around nutrition risks for people on special diets.
Some training needs had been identified and were being addressed by the provider in relation to nutritional risks.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: October 2021
Requires improvement
Safe
!
Requires improvement
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews