Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Enough staff on duty, improved training and a supportive culture, but safety issues with risks, medicines and infection control hold it back."
Further improvements were needed to the risk assessments and care plans... Further improvements were needed to the systems in place to administer medicines safely... some areas that still needed to be addressed to ensure people were safe from the spread of infection.
Staff told us they felt more supported... Staff told us they felt more confident to raise concerns with the registered manager.
The staff rota showed there were sufficient staff on duty to keep people safe... We observed there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs.
Staff told us training had been improved and they had completed training in relation to their roles. Training records were more organised, and a training matrix had been developed.
The registered manager had made improvements to their governance systems and they carried out a variety of internal audits... However, these needed to be strengthened because they were not always effective at identifying areas where improvement was needed.
We saw that staff engagement with people had improved... However, we found that some staff interactions were still task focused and lacked a person-centred approach.
Risk plans and care plans are not up to date for every resident, medicine records have conflicting details like wrong insulin doses, and infection control has gaps like poor mop storage.
the registered manager told us they were still working on these, so they had not been reviewed for everyone living at the service... There was conflicting information on the Medication Administration Records (MAR), the PRN (as needed) protocols and the grab sheets. For example, one person's grab sheet showed incorrect levels of a person's insulin... the storage and sterilisation programme for mop heads did not follow best practice.
Quality audits and checks keep missing problems, so managers do not spot all the issues that need fixing.
these [internal audits] needed to be strengthened because they were not always effective at identifying areas where improvement was needed. For example, medicines audits had not been effective at recognising the conflicting information we found in medicines records.
Activities take place but staff interactions are often task-focused with little person-centred engagement, making the role feel routine.
we found that many staff interactions were still task focused and lacked a person-centred approach. For example, at lunch time there was no other interactions from staff except to give people their meals and then take away their empty plates.
AI Generated
Last inspected: June 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp