Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff feel supported by the provider, but unsafe staffing, training gaps, and poor management oversight put people at risk."
Medicines were not being managed safely or administered as prescribed... The provider did not demonstrate people were being given their medicines as prescribed as staff were not following the correct administration times.
Staff told us they felt supported by the provider. However, our assessment identified significant shortfalls whereby the provider failed to adequately support staff. For example, staff rotas were completed a week in advance, which did not demonstrate staff were given ample time to know their working patterns.
Safe staffing levels were not robustly assessed or reviewed which placed people at risk of harm. There was not always enough staff to meet people’s needs... only 1 staff member was on duty between the time of 21.30 and 22.00 for 15 people.
The provider failed to ensure staff had completed safe and effective training. We found staff had not completed training to meet the specific needs of people they supported, for example, epilepsy and diabetes training had not been undertaken.
The provider did not have oversight of the service to monitor quality and safety appropriately. Furthermore, we found shortfalls in their regulatory knowledge to drive improvements and meet the required regulations.
We found limited evidence of meaningful activities taking place at the care home, and no evidence of any activities specifically designed for people living with dementia. The provider employed an ‘activities co-ordinator’, but we found when they had planned leave, arrangements were not made to cover this role.
Not enough staff at times, like only one on nights for 15 people, leaving everyone stretched and rushed.
only 1 staff member was on duty between the time of 21.30 and 22.00 for 15 people. The provider had failed to recognise the risk associated with this and told us this had always been their staffing arrangement.
Big gaps in staff training, no courses on epilepsy, diabetes, or end of life care.
staff had not completed training to meet the specific needs of people they supported, for example, epilepsy and diabetes training had not been undertaken. Furthermore, not all staff had completed training in end-of-life care.
No real management oversight, so issues like unsafe meds and risks aren't fixed properly.
The provider did not have oversight of the service to monitor quality and safety appropriately... The provider failed to act upon concerns raised by the Local Authority in a timely way, which led to further concerns and risk.
AI Generated
Last inspected: July 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Inadequate
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp