Working at St Judes
44 Unicorn Lane, Coventry, CV5 7LJ
Operated by Mr & Mrs J Cahill
27 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
5.3/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 5.3/10
Key Finding
"Positive culture where staff feel valued alongside engaging activities, but audits miss record keeping gaps and equipment risks."
Safety & Risk
6/10
✓
People felt safe... Staff had completed safeguarding training... People received the medicines they were prescribed... regular medicine audit checks were completed... but we identified some medicine recording issues.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Both people and staff had confidence in the management team and staff felt valued and well supported. This had resulted in a positive, encouraging and supportive culture within the home.
Staffing Levels
5/10
!
There were enough staff on duty to keep people safe... People felt more staff were needed at the home because they were sometimes kept waiting but we saw there were sufficient numbers of staff.
Training & Dev
5/10
!
Staff had completed training considered essential to support people's needs and to work safely. Staff spoke positively about the training and support they received... New staff received an induction and completed online training linked to the Care Certificate.
Management
4/10
!
Audit processes had not identified areas needing improvement in regard to record keeping. They had also not identified potential risks related to the environment and equipment.
Programmes
6/10
✓
An activity organiser planned daily group activities that people could participate in if they wished... daily reminiscence session which included reading a poem, completing a quiz, and crossword. We saw these sessions were well attended.
Points to consider
Bosses are dedicated and approachable but audits miss risks like worn equipment and record gaps so problems are not always spotted early.
Audit processes had not identified areas needing improvement in regard to record keeping. They had also not identified potential risks related to the environment and equipment.
Staffing is adequate and call bells get answered but residents sometimes wait on busier days and feel more staff would help.
People felt more staff were needed at the home because they were sometimes kept waiting but we saw there were sufficient numbers of staff to support people during our visit and call bells were answered in a timely way.
Only standard essential training and Care Certificate basics with no specialist courses or funded qualifications mentioned.
Staff had completed training considered essential to support people's needs and to work safely... New staff received an induction and completed online training linked to the Care Certificate.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: October 2019
Good
Safe
?
Not rated
Effective
?
Not rated
Caring
?
Not rated
Responsive
?
Not rated
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews