Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff feel valued with enough staffing, good training and activities, but medicines safety issues and poor governance hold it back."
Medicines optimisation Score:2 ... numerous discrepancies where stock counts did not match ... gaps in both fridge and room temperature checks ... risks to people from anticoagulant medicines had not always been incorporated into their care plans.
Staff told us they felt valued and appreciated and spoke positively about the initiatives in place to support their wellbeing. ... monthly team-building activities ... staff bingo nights, two quiz nights ... continental breakfast ... pizzas ... Employee of the Month scheme.
Staff told us there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. ... We don’t have agency staff unless they are providing 1:1, even those are regular. People and relatives were positive about staffing levels.
Staff were positive about their training and support. A staff member said, “St Joseph’s provides me with sufficient training to meet people’s needs. Practical training undertaken includes fire simulated evacuation exercises and participation in a Virtual Dementia Tour.”
Governance, management and sustainability Score:1 Effective governance systems were not in place to ensure safety and quality concerns were identified and acted upon. Audits did not identify shortfalls in monitoring charts, medicines reconciliation, temperature records.
An activity plan was in place. This plan was regularly reviewed with people ... Singers come in the social area ... Brownies singing ... therapy dog goes round. The vicar gives holy communion ... parties are wonderful.
Medication records don't match stock counts and there are gaps in temperature checks, so you can't be sure meds are stored and given safely.
When we reconciled medicines, we found numerous discrepancies where stock counts did not match the amounts recorded on the electronic medicines system. Staff had not identified gaps in both fridge and room temperature checks.
Checks and audits keep missing problems with monitoring charts, equipment, and infection control, so issues aren't fixed until inspectors point them out.
Audits were carried out; however, they did not always identify and address shortfalls ... Monitoring charts, such as repositioning and fluid intake records, did not consistently align ... Checks on pressure-relieving equipment were insufficient ... provider systems to identify potential infection control risks did not identify all risks.
Staff rely on verbal handovers more than written risk assessments because care plans have conflicting info and gaps.
People’s care plans had conflicting information. ... Not all related care plans had anticoagulant risk assessments ... A staff member told us, “I don’t really look at the risk assessment. We have a lot of verbal risk assessments.”
AI Generated
Last inspected: January 2020
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp