Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Effective leadership and teamwork with low staff turnover and strong safety systems, but a lack of structured activities programme."
Systems and processes supported people's safety and risks were appropriately assessed. People were safely supported with their medicines, although one person's controlled drugs were not stored separately and the registered provider agreed to review this.
There was a very friendly, homely atmosphere and people said they felt well cared for. Staff were respectful in their communications with people.
Recruitment procedures were in place, although there was a low staff turnover. We saw staffing levels were based upon people's individual needs and the registered provider told us this would be reviewed if people's needs changed.
Staff completed regular training and engaged in supervision meetings with the provider. People told us they thought staff had the right skills to care for them.
The registered provider was very involved in people's care and support and they knew each person well. There was open communication in the home and evidence of effective leadership and teamwork.
People told us they planned their day around what they wanted to do individually, such as go to the shops or out to other local places. We saw the activities people undertook were self-directed.
No activities coordinator or structured programme, so the role is mostly supporting self-directed outings and daily chores like cooking and cleaning.
We saw the activities people undertook were self-directed. For example, one person chose to go out for a run and another person went to meet a friend.
Only regular training and supervision meetings, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff completed regular training and engaged in supervision meetings with the provider.
Staffing levels match low resident needs with low turnover, but no staff comments on workloads or evidence of extra recruitment efforts.
We saw staffing levels were based upon people's individual needs... People's dependency needs were low and they told us they were confident staff were on hand.
AI Generated
Last inspected: May 2018
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp