Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Good leadership, sufficient staffing and strong team morale, although the manager splitting time across homes led to overlooked checks and unclear medicines records."
Some documentation and recording of medicines needed improving but we checked the stock of sample of medicines and were reassured that this was a recording issue and did not impact on people receiving medicines.
All the staff we spoke with were committed to providing a good quality service and cared about the job they did. Staff worked well together and morale within the team was good.
Staff told us they felt there were sufficient staff to meet people's needs. One staff member told us, 'Got enough staff here definitely.'
Staff received training in areas such as, but not limited to, epilepsy, diabetes, data protection, risk assessing, and person-centred care planning.
Staff spoke positively about the management team and its leadership. One staff member told us, 'We've got good leadership too.'
People had written 'my perfect day' plans which detailed which staff they would like to support them and went through how they would spend their perfect day. Staff told us they then supported people to have their perfect day each month.
The manager also runs two other homes, so was not always on site and some checks got overlooked.
The registered manager was also registered to manage another two of the provider's services which were at some geographical distance away. They were well supported by the team leader and assistant manager which minimised the impact of this, however we did find some minor instances of things being overlooked
Some medication records lacked detail on when to give as-needed doses and stock checks were not always clear.
Some documentation and recording of medicines needed improving. For example, 'As required' guidance was in place for each person but did not always provide detailed guidance about when to give these medicines. It was not always clear how stock was being recorded and reconciled with medicine administration.
Recruitment did not always check if old background checks were still valid.
Staff had been recruited safely. Although, it was not clear how the service ensured disclosure and barring checks were still relevant when these had been carried out many years prior.
AI Generated
Last inspected: May 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp