Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Enough staff meet needs safely with an activities co-ordinator running quizzes and gardening, but inadequate training for learning disabilities and outstanding management actions hold it back."
Safeguarding referrals had not always been submitted when needed. For example, a safeguarding referral was not made when one person ate someone's food that was not in line with their SALT assessed diet. Risk assessments were not always up to date and consistent.
Staff told us they had not been involved in determining the future direction of the home and were unhappy they had not been consulted with regarding the change of direction. Some staff were aware that some colleagues were unsure whether they would continue working at the home.
People and relatives told us there were enough staff to meet people’s needs safely but staff did not feel confident in supporting people with learning disabilities despite sufficient numbers observed.
The training matrix showed that staff were not adequately trained to meet the needs of all people who were living at the home. There were low completion rates for autism and learning disability training and a lot of staff were also out of date with mandatory training.
Staff told us they were not always sure when one of the management team was in and available which could be frustrating for them. The new manager had put together an action plan which they were in the process of working through but many actions remained outstanding.
Per 2022 comprehensive inspection: An activities co-ordinator was employed who encouraged participation in ball games, quizzes, colouring, musical sessions and gardening.
Staff training is way behind with lots out of date on basics and almost no one trained for learning disabilities or autism so you won't feel equipped for the job.
low completion rates for autism and learning disability training and a lot of staff were also out of date with mandatory training.
Safeguarding alerts and accident reports are often missed so there's no proper learning from mistakes to keep people safe.
safeguarding referrals had not always been submitted when needed. For example, where a person ate someone else’s lunch which was not in line with their SALT assessed diet... Incidents and accidents were reviewed but appropriate actions had not always been taken.
New manager is trying but actions from audits and plans are not done on time and staff don't know when leaders are around.
The new manager had put together an action plan which they were in the process of working through but many actions remained outstanding at the time of the site visit. Staff told us they were not always sure when one of the management team was in and available.
AI Generated
Last inspected: January 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp