Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Supportive management and good staff morale with effective safety measures, but activities are not always person-centred."
The provider had effective safeguarding systems. Staff had received training and had a good understanding of how to ensure people were protected from harm or abuse. Appropriate arrangements were in place for the safe management of medicines.
The service had an established staff team. Staff told us teamwork and morale were good. One staff member said 'I received supervision throughout the pandemic and have found the organisation and manager to be very supportive. We have received little gifts to show how much we are appreciated.'
There were sufficient staff available. People received their care in a timely manner.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Training the provider had deemed mandatory was delivered to staff. Additional training was provided to meet people's needs, for example, staff had received training in epilepsy and diabetes.
The registered manager is approachable and easy to talk to. Staff told us the organisation and manager to be very supportive.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: A range of meaningful activities were available for people to participate in. We received mixed feedback from relatives regarding activities. One relative said 'The only thing regarding [name of person] is the activities are not person-centred for them.'
No activities coordinator or specialist programmes, so the role involves mostly routine care with some basic group events like singing.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: We received mixed feedback from relatives regarding activities. One relative said 'The only thing regarding [name of person] is the activities are not person-centred for them. Activities such as knitting do not appeal.'
Staffing is adequate but nothing special, with no details on low agency use or strong retention.
There were sufficient staff available. People received their care in a timely manner.
Only standard mandatory training plus some basic specialist topics, no funded qualifications or career development.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Training the provider had deemed mandatory was delivered to staff. Additional training was provided to meet people's needs. For example, staff had received training in epilepsy and diabetes.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2020
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp