Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Enough staff to meet needs and good team communication, although leadership changes and poor training on mental capacity hold it back."
Risks to people’s safety and wellbeing were not always addressed in a timely and comprehensive way. Risk assessments were not always updated in a timely manner.
Staff told us they felt there was good communication and relationships within the staff team. Staff felt able to speak up about any concerns.
There were sufficient staff deployed to meet people’s needs and safe recruitment practices were undertaken. Staff told us they felt there were sufficient staff deployed.
Not all staff were aware of the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and processes were not always followed to ensure capacity assessments and best interest decisions were recorded.
There was a lack of overall governance and there had been a number of changes to the senior leadership team. This had led to inconsistencies in the service not being identified or acted upon.
Staff supported people to do things they enjoyed in the local area. They told us people regularly visited the local garden centre, shops.
Training misses key areas like mental capacity rules, so staff lack guidance on important legal duties.
Staff were not aware of their responsibilities in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
No activities programme or coordinator, so the role is mostly routine support with basic outings.
People told us they were able to choose how they spent their time... local garden centre, shops.
Leadership changes have led to poor oversight, so problems like outdated risk plans aren't fixed quickly.
There had been a number of changes within the senior leadership team which had led to a lack of consistency and oversight.
AI Generated
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp