Working at Restoration Residential Care Home
8 Oakmead Road, Croydon, CR0 3AS
Operated by RRC (GB) Ltd
4 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
6.4/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 6.4/10
Key Finding
"Supportive leadership and positive culture where staff feel valued, although basic activities without specialist programmes and standard training limit appeal."
Safety & Risk
7/10
✓
Medicines were managed safely. Senior staff audited medicines stock and records at regular intervals and checked staff's competency.
Staff Culture
7/10
✓
Staff felt respected, supported and valued which supported a positive and improvement-driven culture. Staff felt able to raise concerns without fear.
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
There were enough staff to support people and meet their needs.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Staff received relevant training to help them meet people's needs. Staff were required to update their training and attend refresher courses.
Management
7/10
✓
The registered manager worked directly with people and led by example. People knew them well and engaged with them happily.
Programmes
5/10
!
People were supported to take part in activities... such as arts and crafts, games and sports such as tennis in the garden, group outings to a local farm and bowling.
Points to consider
The role is mostly routine personal care with basic activities like arts, crafts, games and outings, no coordinator or specialist programmes to make days more varied.
staff supported people to undertake activities to support their wellbeing such as arts and crafts, games and sports such as tennis in the garden.
Only standard training updates and regular supervision, no specialist courses or funded qualifications for career growth.
Staff received relevant training to help them meet people's needs. Staff received support in the form of supervision and appraisal at regular intervals.
Staffing is adequate to meet needs but nothing special, no details on low agency use or stable long-serving team.
There were enough staff to support people. Staff were present and provided appropriate support.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: October 2022
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews