Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff feel supported by managers with a good range of activities, but serious medicines management gaps and training mismatches need fixing."
Improvements were needed to ensure people's medicines were always safely managed. Protocols for 2 peoples as required (PRN) emergency epilepsy rescue medication were not held on the medicines file, increasing the risk of staff not having important information quickly to hand in an emergency.
Staff told us they felt supported by managers and the provider. A staff member said, “We have management that is really good and supportive, always encouraging us.”
The recruitment records we reviewed did not detail staff responses to interview questions. This meant we could not be assured the provider operated robust processes to gather all relevant information to confirm that the potential candidate was of good character.
A member of staff told us they had received training in relation to emergency rescue medicine for people living with epilepsy, but the provider’s training records showed they had not.
The provider did not always oversee the service effectively to monitor quality and safety.
During our visits, we observed a range of activities took place, including tabletop games, people visiting the local shops, gym and a seaside trip.
Medication handling has serious gaps like missing emergency protocols and doses not always given right, making your shifts riskier for residents.
Protocols for 2 peoples as required (PRN) emergency epilepsy rescue medication were not held on the medicines file, increasing the risk of staff not having important information quickly to hand in an emergency.
Training records do not match what staff say they know, with big gaps in emergency epilepsy medication training.
A member of staff told us they had received training in relation to emergency rescue medicine for people living with epilepsy, but the provider’s training records showed they had not.
Recruitment checks are incomplete with no records of interview answers, so you cannot be fully sure new staff are properly vetted.
The recruitment records we reviewed did not detail staff responses to interview questions. This meant we could not be assured the provider operated robust processes to gather all relevant information to confirm that the potential candidate was of good character.
AI Generated
Last inspected: August 2024
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp