Working at Red Gables
1 Pinnocks Croft, Burnham on Sea, TA8 2NF
Operated by Voyage 1 Limited
11 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
6.5/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 6.5/10
Key Finding
"Visible leaders and a supportive open culture, but limited activities programme and gaps in safety checks hold it back."
Safety & Risk
6/10
✓
People were protected and kept safe. Staff managed medicines well. Improvements made to safeguarding since last inspection, though some documentation gaps were rectified on site.
Staff Culture
7/10
✓
The service had a good learning culture. There was an open and honest culture within the team. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust.
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
There were sufficient and consistent staff to provide personalised care and support. Relatives said, “They seem [to have] plenty of staff and they do job well”.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Managers made sure staff received training. Staff received effective support, supervision and development including training on supporting people with learning disabilities and autism.
Management
8/10
✓
Leaders were visible and staff felt supported by them. Comments included, “(Registered manager) is amazing, very approachable and understanding” and “(Registered manager) and (Operations manager) listen, they are great.”
Programmes
5/10
!
People were supported by staff to take part in and enjoy activities and hobbies within the local community. Relatives mentioned support for music events and theatre.
Points to consider
No activities coordinator or structured programme mentioned, so the role is mostly routine care with some community outings.
People were supported by staff to take part in and enjoy activities and hobbies within the local community.
Staffing is adequate but had a gap in checks for a delegated clinical task by a health professional.
One person was being supported with a clinical task that had been delegated by a health professional. Although staff had received training, competency assessments had not been completed by a health professional. This was rectified during the assessment.
Some risk documents missed details and cleaning schedules had gaps, even though fixed quickly.
Some additional information and control measures were missing from some documentation. This was rectified during the assessment. Cleaning schedules in place contained some gaps.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: January 2025
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews