Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Good staffing and happy staff, but no permanent manager, poor safeguarding, and no activities programme."
Systems in place were not always effective at ensuring people were protected from abuse and neglect. Incidents were not reviewed, and safeguarding concerns were not always escalated appropriately.
Staff told us they were happy working at the service.
We found staffing levels to be good and there were enough staff to meet people’s needs during the inspection.
Staff did not always receive training appropriate to their role, for example, staff were not trained in supporting people with learning disabilities.
At the time of the inspection there was no registered manager, and the service was being overseen by 2 new managers.
There was no visible activity planner or calendar for the day, week or month and no schedule of activities.
No permanent manager in post, so leadership oversight has gaps like missing safeguarding audits.
At the time of the inspection there was no registered manager, and the service was being overseen by 2 new managers.
Staff lack training for dementia, learning disabilities, and distressed behaviours, so skills don't match needs.
Staff did not always receive training appropriate to their role, for example, staff were not trained in supporting people with learning disabilities.
No activities programme or coordinator delivering yet, so the role is mostly routine personal care.
There was no visible activity planner or calendar for the day, week or month and no schedule of activities.
AI Generated
Last inspected: July 2022
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp