Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff praised the supportive culture, good training and safe practices, but basic in-house activities and no permanent manager at inspection are drawbacks."
We looked at the Medication Administration Records [MAR] for all people living at the service. These showed apart from one incident, each person had received their medicines at the times they needed them, and records were kept in good order. The incident was discussed with the manager and immediate action was taken.
Staff told us they felt valued and supported and received formal supervision at regular intervals. One member of staff told us, 'I receive regular supervision and feel very supported by the manager.'
The deployment of staff was appropriate and there were enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff told us staffing levels were appropriate to meet people's needs and there were always enough staff available.
Staff were supported to complete both mandatory and specialist training relating to the needs of people being currently supported. The latter referred to Diabetes, Epilepsy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy [PEG] training.
Staff were complimentary regarding the management of the service and confirmed there was good teamwork and communication. People using the service, relatives and staff were complimentary regarding the manager and suggested the service was well managed and led.
Due to the pandemic, people were no longer able to access their usual formal day care provision. The service had adapted their 'in house' social activity programme to ensure people's social care needs could be met. Each person using the service had their own social activities portfolio.
No dedicated activities coordinator or specialist programmes, just basic in-house activities like singing, baking and storybooks during the pandemic.
Due to the pandemic, people were no longer able to access their usual formal day care provision. The service had adapted their 'in house' social activity programme to ensure people's social care needs could be met.
Staffing is adequate with enough staff on shift, but no details on low agency use or long team retention.
Staff told us staffing levels were appropriate to meet people's needs and there were always enough staff available.
No permanent manager in place at the time of inspection, though registered afterwards.
At the time of our inspection the service did not have a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission.
AI Generated
Last inspected: June 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp