Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff feel supported by approachable management with good training and staffing, but limited activities and gaps in risk assessments hold it back."
There were gaps in some of the mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions completed. The quality of some risk assessments was variable and there were some gaps in the risk assessments we viewed.
Staff said they enjoyed their work and felt supported by management. Staff told us the management of the service were approachable, and they were well supported.
The service had suitable qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. Records we reviewed showed the provider had a safe recruitment process.
The service recently employed a training manager who was implementing various face to face training for staff to develop their learning. Training records were kept for staff and monitored for compliance.
The service had quality assurance and monitoring systems however, they were not always consistent in identifying shortfalls at the service. We found gaps in some assessments.
One relative told us, “People (residents) look well cared for generally and there is usually some kind of activity going on to keep them occupied and engaged.”
Only basic activities going on now and then, no dedicated coordinator or regular varied programme to make the job more interesting.
One relative told us, “People (residents) look well cared for generally and there is usually some kind of activity going on to keep them occupied and engaged.”
Gaps in risk assessments for things like choking risks and skin creams, and incomplete mental capacity paperwork.
Risk assessments relating to the health, safety and welfare of people were not always being completed or lacked sufficient detail. For example, people who had been assessed by speech and language therapist (SALT) (and are at risk of choking)
Quality audits and checks do not always spot problems like gaps in risk assessments and mental capacity paperwork.
The service had quality assurance and monitoring systems however, they were not always consistent in identifying shortfalls at the service. We found gaps in some assessments.
AI Generated
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp