Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Supportive leadership, positive culture and good training with stable staffing, but gaps in safety checks and monitoring hold it back."
Risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing were assessed but we found there were gaps in monitoring and not all risks had been assessed robustly. Accidents and incidents were generally reported but we found inconsistencies.
There was a positive and open culture at the service. Staff felt appreciated and involved in the day to day running of the home. One staff member said, 'Management always ask how we are doing and if we need any support and they will genuinely support us.'
There was a consistent and experienced staff team in place. Safe staffing levels were in place. The registered manager used a dependency tool to assess how many staff were needed.
Recruitment was managed safely and staff received good induction, training, and supervision. Staff received regular training and their competency was assessed in line with good practise.
The registered manager and manager provided staff with leadership and promoted an inclusive and supportive team culture. Feedback about the management was very positive and they were described as approachable.
People were supported to live healthier lives, access healthcare service and support. This included having access to gentle exercise and opportunities to take part in activities outside of the home. On both days of the inspection a group of people enjoyed an outing to the local garden centre.
Risk checks have gaps like wrong mattress settings and incomplete records for behaviours or incidents, so it's not fully safe.
Where people were at risk due to their skin integrity, risk assessments were not always clear and people were not always repositioned regularly. We reviewed 4 people who had been assessed to need pressure relieving mattresses and the settings were not set correctly. Accidents and incidents were generally reported but we found inconsistencies.
Just basic outings and a sensory garden, no activities coordinator or varied programme, so the job is mostly routine care.
On both days of the inspection a group of people enjoyed an outing to the local garden centre. The outdoor space had been adapted to include a sensory garden walk.
Audits and monitoring miss problems like care record shortfalls, so leadership oversight isn't strong enough.
The provider's systems did not always effectively monitor the service to drive improvements in service delivery. Audits of care records and accident forms were not always effective.
AI Generated
Last inspected: January 2024
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp