Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Enough staff and engaging activities, but staff missing key training and new management with weak governance hold it back."
where risks to people were identified, such as risks from engaging in community activities, these were not always risk assessed; medicines were not always stored in a safe, temperature-controlled environment.
We received mixed feedback from staff over the culture of the organisation. All staff we spoke to told us culture focused on keeping people safe. However, 1 staff member told us sometimes staff conflicted with each other, and another staff member told us more work was needed to promote new activities and independence skills.
Relatives told us there were enough staff on duty to safely care and support people; the service had enough staff, including for 1:1 support.
where people’s condition posed a risk to their health, for example diabetes, staff had not received the required training. In addition, where people experienced swallowing difficulties or other conditions, not all staff had completed the training in a timely manner.
The manager was new to the service and in the process of registering with us; governance systems and audits did not identify the discrepancies found during this assessment.
People told us they accessed the community and regularly engaged in their chosen hobbies and interests; observed staff encouraging people to engage in a wide range of activities in the home and in the community.
Staff missing training on key health conditions like diabetes and swallowing problems, so you might not always feel ready to support people safely.
staff had not received the required training. In addition, where people experienced swallowing difficulties or other conditions, not all staff had completed the training in a timely manner.
No permanent manager registered yet, and checks missed problems like outdated records and risks.
The manager was new to the service and in the process of registering with us. Governance systems and audits did not identify the discrepancies found during this assessment.
Risk assessments often missing or not up to date, and medication storage had temperature recording gaps.
these were not always risk assessed. This meant the provider could not be assured people risks to people were managed safely. Whilst temperatures were being taken, there were numerous gaps in the recordings.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2024
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp