Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff received good training and supervision with enough staff and a positive culture, but medicines were not managed safely and audits were ineffective."
Medicines were not always managed safely... Risks to people had been assessed but guidance in place was not always up to date or with enough detail... no oversight of accidents and incidents to review for trends and patterns.
Staff told us there was a positive culture within the service... great atmosphere within the service, where they worked together to provide good outcomes for people.
We observed there to be sufficient staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe. People and relatives we spoke with told us there was sufficient staff.
Staff had received training in a range of subjects including supporting people with learning disabilities and dementia... Staff had regular supervision with the registered manager and told us they felt well supported.
There was no robust audit system to review care plans... Medicine audit systems had been ineffective in highlighting poor practice regarding medicines administration.
Staff built a bar in the garden where people could meet for a drink and opened a small shop... hallway bingo was created for people who were in their rooms.
Medications weren't handled safely, with missing signatures on records, pain patches not tracked properly, and night shift stock mismatches.
Medicines were not always managed safely. Two people had pain relief patches... staff did not record the position... handwritten entries had not been double signed... stock did not match the documented numbers.
Managers didn't spot issues because audits on care plans, medications, and incidents weren't thorough enough.
There was no robust audit system to review care plans... Medicine audit systems had been ineffective... no oversight of accidents and incidents, to review for trends and patterns.
Risk guides for problems like choking or constipation lacked detail or weren't kept up to date.
Risks to people had been assessed but guidance in place was not always up to date or with enough detail. For example, when people were at risk of choking, there was no guidance for staff to follow.
AI Generated
Last inspected: December 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp