Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff praised the positive open culture and up-to-date training, but weak audits and medicines safety issues need fixing."
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the way people’s medicines were managed. We identified that stock counts of people’s medicines did not always balance with the records held
Staff gave positive feedback about the culture of the service. Staff reported a positive open culture where they felt empowered to raise any concerns or make suggestions
We observed there were enough staff on duty to support people. We received mixed feedback from staff about staffing levels. Some staff thought there were sufficient and others that they could be rushed
The training matrix showed that most staff had completed mandatory training. At the start of the assessment no staff had completed specific training relating to learning disability and autism. At the end of the assessment, the registered manager told us 90% of the staff had completed this training
The audits were not always robust enough to highlight and manage shortfalls in the service. For example, audits of staff files had not detected issues with missing information, medicines audits had not identified the medicines concerns
The activities schedule on display showed various events such as, exercises, bingo, tuck shop, movie afternoons, card games, external singers/performers, singalongs, music and movement and target games
Medicines stock counts do not match records so some tablets go unaccounted for, and no one checked bowel charts before deciding on laxatives for constipation.
stock counts of people’s medicines did not always balance with the records held. This meant there were medicines that were unaccounted for... There was no oversight of bowel records
Audits missed key problems like gaps in staff files, medicines issues, and constipation risks that led to regulatory breaches.
The audits were not always robust enough to highlight and manage shortfalls in the service. For example, audits of staff files had not detected issues with missing information, medicines audits had not identified the medicines concerns
Staff files are missing full job histories and interview notes, even though other checks were done.
not all staff files contained a full employment history and reason for gaps. Interview records had not been retained
AI Generated
Last inspected: March 2023
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp