Working at Lawrence Mews
132 Church Street, Nottingham, NG16 3HT
Operated by Blue Sky Care Limited
5 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
5.3/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 5.3/10
Key Finding
"Staff feel supported with a consistent team and good training, but safety lapses like infection risks and poor governance on maintenance hold it back."
Safety & Risk
3/10
✕
People were not always protected from the risk of potential health infections, and there were lapses in good food hygiene practices by staff... This was a breach of regulation 12.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Staff felt well supported by the registered manager and provider. Staff told us the registered manager was approachable and they felt supported by them.
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
There were enough staff employed to support the five people who lived at the care home. People were supported by care staff who had the right mix of skills... There was a consistent staff team.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Staff received the necessary training. A staff member told us, 'I think I've had all the training I need. I was also able to do some extra online training to learn about epilepsy.' The provider had a training plan.
Management
4/10
!
The provider's quality monitoring and governance processes were not always effective. The impact of this was seen in the way some maintenance and environmental safety issues had not been identified by the provider until we inspected.
Programmes
6/10
✓
People were offered opportunities to try new experiences... supported to go on holiday... trips to local events, shopping, meals out and leisure activities. People attended various activities they had chosen.
Points to consider
Infection risks like black mould on walls, Legionella checks missing, and food carried through laundry area were not handled well.
Some rooms had black mould present on the walls... Legionella risk assessment... not in place... prepared food was carried... through the laundry room... exposed people's food to the risk of cross contamination.
Poor oversight let safety and maintenance problems like loose handrails and broken toilet seats go unnoticed.
Environmental safety concerns were not always identified... a safety handrail was not securely attached... a person's toilet seat was broken... provider's governance processes had not identified the safety issues.
Only enough staff to get by with no details on low agency use or super stable teams letting rushed care happen sometimes.
There were enough staff employed to support the five people... consistent staff team.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: April 2020
Requires improvement
Safe
!
Requires improvement
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews