Working at La Rosa 2
39 Stanthorpe Road, London, SW16 2DZ
Operated by La Rosa Homes Ltd
6 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
4.4/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 10 February 2026
Score: 4.4/10
Key Finding
"Staff feel supported by owners with good training, but no permanent manager and unsafe medicine storage are major concerns."
Safety & Risk
3/10
✕
Medicines were not always safely managed on behalf of the people living in the care home. This was because we found medicines were not always safely stored. For example, we observed several instances of staff leaving keys in the medicines cabinet door and the medicines fridge unlocked.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Staff told us they received all the support they needed from the services owner and senior staff team.
Staffing Levels
5/10
!
We saw at least two care staff were always working in the care home throughout the inspection, which was the minimum number the provider had determined was required during the day to safely support the people currently residing at La Rosa 2.
Training & Dev
5/10
!
Staff had received all the relevant training they needed to effectively carry out their working roles and responsibilities. This was because it was mandatory for all staff to complete a comprehensive induction programme that was mapped to the Care Certificate.
Management
2/10
✕
The service had not had a manager registered with the CQC since the provider reregistered the care home as a new legal entity 18 months ago in June 2020.
Programmes
4/10
!
People were supported to participate in meaningful recreational and leisure activities that reflected their social interests.
Points to consider
No permanent manager in place, so oversight is weak and incidents like safeguarding concerns are not always reported properly.
The service had not had a manager registered with the CQC since the provider reregistered the care home as a new legal entity 18 months ago in June 2020.
Safety risks from unlocked medicine storage, faulty fire doors, uncovered radiators and poor infection control practices.
Medicines were not always safely managed... we observed several instances of staff leaving keys in the medicines cabinet door and the medicines fridge unlocked... fire resistant doors did not always automatically close... none of the home's radiators had been covered.
Only basic activities like cooking meals, shopping trips and church visits, with no activities coordinator or specialist programmes to make the job more varied.
People were supported to participate in meaningful recreational and leisure activities that reflected their social interests.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: December 2021
Requires improvement
Safe
!
Requires improvement
Effective
!
Requires improvement
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews