Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Enough staff and good training, but inconsistent management leaves staff feeling unsupported and risks not managed properly."
People were exposed to risk of harm as the provider had failed to ensure risks were managed appropriately. Staff did not always follow the control measures recorded in people's care plans. Appropriate follow up action was not always taken after incidents such as falls.
Inconsistent management had negatively affected the culture of the staff team. Staff explained they often felt unsupported in their roles due to lack of effective leadership. Some staff commented support had improved since the provider had been more present in the home.
Our observations showed there were enough staff to meet people's needs, however they were not always deployed effectively. An agency staff member was not fully informed about people's care needs before being deployed.
Staff received an induction and completed mandatory training to enable them to carry out their job roles effectively. Some staff told us supervisions were irregular.
Inconsistent management had negatively affected the culture of the staff team. Staff explained they often felt unsupported in their roles due to lack of effective leadership. People and their relatives shared concerns about the approachability and visibility of management.
An activities programme was in place and there were dedicated staff to provide social activity for people. People and relatives provided negative feedback about activities and engagement; they told us activities in the home were limited. The provider had developed an action plan to improve the choice of activities.
No permanent on-site manager and inconsistent leadership leaves staff feeling unsupported.
Inconsistent management had negatively affected the culture of the staff team. Staff explained they often felt unsupported in their roles due to lack of effective leadership. One of the registered managers had recently left their post. The second registered manager was also the nominated individual. They were not based at the service.
Risks to residents not managed properly, like not supervising someone who poses a danger to others and not updating accident records after falls.
People were exposed to risk of harm as control measures to manage risk were not always followed. For example, a person's care plan stated they should be observed in the lounge as they posed a physical risk to others. Records showed this person was involved in multiple incidents. 2 people had experienced falls and their risk assessments had not been updated.
Staffing levels are enough but not deployed well, so response times can be slow and agency staff not always briefed on resident needs.
Systems were not always effectively implemented to ensure the safe deployment of staff. People and their relatives told us they did not feel the staffing levels were safe. One person told us, 'I need help as I can't walk too well but they don't come quickly when I press the buzzer [staff] are very busy'. An agency staff member was not fully informed about people's care needs before being deployed.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2023
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp