Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Visible leadership and strong safety practices, although activities have limited success in engaging residents."
Per 2021 targeted inspection: We were assured that the provider was preventing visitors from catching and spreading infections... using PPE effectively and safely... accessing testing... promoting safety through the layout and hygiene practices... making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed. Per 2019: People were protected from harm because staff had the skills and confidence to identify signs of potential abuse and report them.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: People and staff gave positive feedback about the leadership in the home... There was a caring and friendly atmosphere in the home.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: There were enough staff to provide safe care and support at all times, and people we spoke with confirmed this. One person said, 'There's always someone at hand, they usually come quite quickly.'
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff we spoke with told us they received the training and supervision they needed... Records showed staff had access to regular, planned supervision meetings that followed a pre-planned structure to ensure discussions were meaningful. Goals were set and followed up.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: The registered manager was a known presence in the home and maintained an 'open door' policy so that people and staff could talk to them at any time. Per 2021: The registered manager frequently met with people and staff to updated them about new Covid-19 guidance and rules. Open discussions were encouraged.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: The registered manager told us they had a co-ordinator to lead activities... We saw staff engaged people in conversation and some activity during our visit... there had been limited success. One person told us they did not enjoy the activities and they often felt bored.
Role mostly routine personal care with basic activities led by a coordinator but limited success in engaging everyone.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: there had been limited success. For example, when people said they wanted outings from the home arrangements for transport had been put in place, however people declined participation on the day... One person told us they did not enjoy the activities and they often felt bored.
Only standard training and supervision with no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff we spoke with told us they received the training and supervision they needed to provide people with effective care and support... a new company was providing face to face training.
Staffing levels adequate and safe but nothing special like low agency use or strong retention mentioned.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: There were enough staff to provide safe care and support at all times... 'It's well staffed, you can always find somebody.'
AI Generated
Last inspected: April 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp