Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff feel supported by management with strong safety practices, but staffing shortages and inconsistent activities hold it back."
2022: Staff followed best practice guidance on PPE and infection control; assured on preventing infections, safe admissions, testing and risk assessments; per 2019: detailed risk assessments and safe medicines management.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff felt involved in the running of the home and were supported by the registered manager; people spoke positively about the management team.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: People, their visiting relatives and staff all told us there were not enough staff to meet people's needs, though levels had recently been increased.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Training offered to staff was comprehensive and was updated regularly; 2022: Staff had received training in COVID-19, and infection prevention and control.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff told us they felt supported by the new manager; 2022: staff spoke positively about the support they had received from the registered manager and provider.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: A wide range of activities were planned to suit people's choices, including a book club; activities person was not always present in lounge.
Staff, people and relatives all said there weren't enough staff before a recent increase, so shifts felt stretched.
People, their visiting relatives and staff all told us there were not enough staff to meet people's needs.
Activities person runs a varied programme like book club but isn't always there, so days might lack variety.
we noted that the activities person was the only person in the main lounge, but they were not there all of the time.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2019
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp