Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Supportive leaders and positive staff culture, but lack of activities programme and out-of-date training are concerns."
Incidents and risks not always robustly monitored or detailed enough; some environmental risks like unsecured wardrobes, though fixed promptly.
Staff felt valued and supported, said 'I feel very supported by [registered manager], I can talk to them anytime'; shared vision placing people at centre.
Enough staff available to meet needs, staff consistent and knew people well, but gaps in recruitment screening of employment history.
Processes in place for training but records showed some mandatory staff training had expired at time of inspection.
Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive; staff said '[Registered manager] is approachable and I can go to them for any issues' but governance processes not yet fully embedded after changes.
Mixed relative feedback including 'It seems they don’t do much with [person]’ and ‘[Person] is always in front of the television'; no structured programme or coordinator mentioned.
No real activities programme so shifts are mostly routine care and TV time for residents.
Comments included, “It seems they don’t do much with [person]”, “[Person] is always in front of the television”
Some staff training was out of date when inspectors visited.
the provider’s records evidenced some mandatory staff training had expired.
Incident records and risk assessments often lacked enough detail for staff to follow safely.
incidents and accidents were not always robustly monitored and reviewed... some risk assessments did not contain sufficient detail.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp