Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Some staff culture positives exist, but staffing shortages, weak leadership, and lack of supervision hold it back."
The provider did not ensure all risks to people’s safety and wellbeing were identified or provided enough detail as to how these should be mitigated... We observed 2 members of staff perform unsafe moving and handling practices.
Not all staff employed at the service felt there was a fair culture at the service... Staff confirmed there were few opportunities to discuss their development through formal supervision and appraisal. Not all staff felt there was good teamwork at the service and mainly attributed this to cultural and diversity differences.
The provider did not always make sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff... People told us, “Not enough staff.” We were concerned about the deployment of staff as 1 of 2 communal lounge areas were often left without sufficient staff support.
Staff had not received regular formal supervision or an annual appraisal of their overall performance... Observations of staff’s practice did not provide assurance staff were skilled and competent to effectively apply their learning in their everyday practice.
The service had a manager who was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. The provider and manager did not recognise deficits in their governance and monitoring systems.
People received limited opportunities to participate in meaningful activities... We observed limited opportunity for some people to participate in meaningful social activities that met their needs. This was despite the service having an assigned member of staff responsible for facilitating social activities.
Not enough staff to cover all areas properly, leaving some lounges unsupervised and residents waiting too long for help.
We were concerned about the deployment of staff as 1 of 2 communal lounge areas were often left without sufficient staff support. People told us, “Not enough staff.”
No permanent manager fully registered yet, with leadership missing big problems like risks and poor care practices.
The service had a manager who was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. The provider and manager did not recognise deficits in their governance and monitoring systems.
Staff not always skilled in practice despite some training, like unsafe moving and handling, and no regular supervision or appraisals.
Observations of staff’s practice did not provide assurance staff were skilled and competent... Staff had not received regular formal supervision or an annual appraisal of their overall performance.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Inadequate
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp