Working at Foxhole House
2 & 4 Creaz An Bre, St. Austell, PL26 7SN
Operated by Green Light PBS Limited
3 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
7.3/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 10 February 2026
Score: 7.3/10
Key Finding
"Strong leadership and a positive team culture where staff feel valued and supported, but medicine records for creams lack details on application and effectiveness."
Safety & Risk
6/10
✓
Staff understood how to manage and administer medicines safely, but PRN records lacked details on cream application and effectiveness of administered medicines.
Staff Culture
8/10
✓
Staff felt respected, supported and valued by senior staff which supported a positive and improvement-driven culture. Staff said they worked as a team rather than individuals.
Staffing Levels
7/10
✓
Arrangements for staffing reflected the needs of the person using the service. Staffing levels had recently been reassessed and changes implemented promptly. Staff responded promptly to all requests.
Training & Dev
7/10
✓
Updated training and refresher courses were scheduled so that staff continuously demonstrated best practice. The provider invested in staff by providing them with quality training to meet the needs of the person.
Management
8/10
✓
The registered manager worked directly with the person and led by example. A staff member told us, 'She leads from the front. She asks questions. Communication is very good...'
Programmes
7/10
✓
The person had access to a range of meaningful activities... voluntary work and leisure activities... desensitisation programme... social stories... developing the garden to plant pear trees.
Points to consider
Medication records for when-required creams missed details on when and where to apply them and what help was needed, and didn't note if pain relief worked.
The person's records did not contain information about when and where to apply these creams or what support the person needed. When PRN medicine was administered... staff did not record whether it had been effective or not.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: April 2022
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews