Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Supportive hands-on management, stable permanent staffing and a positive team culture, but medicines records lack personal details and have errors."
People’s medicines were mostly managed safely. However, there was some lack of sufficient individualised and personalised information within people’s medicines records. Protocols... were generic and not person centred.
Staff told us they enjoyed their roles and felt supported by the provider. One staff member said, 'It’s [the culture] better; the atmosphere has changed here.' Another member of staff told us... 'More like a team, we get to know residents more.'
The registered manager told us the service was currently fully staffed, with 10 percent overstaffing to account for annual leave. Most staff told us they felt there were enough staff deployed to meet people’s needs. For example, one staff member said, 'Now we have all permanent staff, it’s much easier to work.'
Staff received training and completion of this was monitored. Staff competency checks took place and were recorded. New staff had an induction that included shadowing experienced staff, followed by further ongoing training.
Staff spoke highly of the registered manager. One staff member said, '[Registered manager]; her door is always open, and we can ask for a chat. Because she is a nurse, she is very involved. She knows all the residents by name and condition. She is hands on.'
The registered manager had overseen the development of the team of activities staff. They told us the provision of activities had previously been lacking... One benefit was that people were now better supported to access the local community.
Some medication records miss personal details and have errors like wrong patch rotation times.
Protocols for people who were prescribed additional medicines for pain relief, anxiety or agitation were generic and not person centred... Records of transdermal patch applications did not show that manufacturer guidance had been followed.
Only standard training with monitoring and induction, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff received training and completion of this was monitored. Staff competency checks took place... New staff had an induction that included shadowing experienced staff, followed by further ongoing training.
Activities team in place with community access but no named specialist programmes or awards.
The registered manager had overseen the development of the team of activities staff... people were now better supported to access the local community and surrounding area.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp