Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Consistent staffing and a supportive culture for staff, but no registered manager and gaps in safety risk plans hold it back."
However, we found one person's fall risk score was not reflective of the number of recent falls despite a recent review and one person's behavioural risk support plan was lacking in guidance for staff.
Staff told us they were supported and enjoyed working at the service.
Records showed there were consistent numbers of staff available to meet people's needs.
Staff had been provided with the provider's mandatory safety training to help ensure people were safe.
The service did not have a manager registered with CQC. This means the provider was legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Per 2018 comprehensive inspection: People were supported to take part in a range of suitable activities inside and outside the home.
No permanent manager in post, so leadership oversight has gaps.
The service did not have a manager registered with CQC.
Risk plans for falls and behaviours not detailed enough for staff, plus gaps recording cream applications.
one person's fall risk score was not reflective of the number of recent falls despite a recent review and one person's behavioural risk support plan was lacking in guidance for staff... medicine administration records (MARs), in relation to the application of external creams were not always completed
Only standard mandatory training, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff had been provided with the provider's mandatory safety training.
AI Generated
Last inspected: April 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp