Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff feel supported and listened to, but no registered manager and staffing shortages on some days undermine safety and outings."
Unexplained injuries had not always been investigated to identify any potential causes so that strategies could be implemented to reduce the risk of reoccurrence.
Staff felt supported and listened to by the management team. Staff felt able to raise concerns and make suggestions.
The rota evidenced on some days there were not enough staff deployed at the service to ensure people had the choice and control to go out as they chose, due the need for two to one staffing.
Systems and processes were not in place to continually review agency training records. We found agency profiles which did not include any evidence of breakaway training and some training appeared out of date.
At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. However, a manager had been appointed and was in the process of registering with CQC.
Records evidenced people were supported to go out daily. However, we received mixed views regarding people being supported to participate in their chosen social and leisure interests.
No permanent manager in place, leading to gaps in oversight and audits missing problems.
At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. However, a manager had been appointed and was in the process of registering with CQC. Systems and processes to ensure the management team had oversight of the service and could make improvements were not always effective. Audits completed on records did not identify the concerns found on inspection.
Not enough staff on some days to support outings and activities that need two staff to one person.
Staffing levels were not always consistent regarding the number of staff available to support people to have choice and control of outings and activities. The rota evidenced on some days there were not enough staff deployed at the service to ensure people had the choice and control to go out as they chose, due the need for two to one staffing.
Unexplained injuries not always investigated properly and some risks like food or bathing not fully assessed.
Unexplained injuries were not always investigated to identify a cause to reduce the risk of reoccurrence. Risk assessments had not always been completed to identify the strategies required to keep people safe from harm. For example, risk assessments had not been completed for known risks regarding food, bathing, and known health conditions.
AI Generated
Last inspected: September 2022
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp