Working at Emm Lane Care Home
72 Emm Lane, Bradford, BD9 4JH
Operated by Mrs Kim Jomeen
14 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
6.9/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 6.9/10
Key Finding
"Supportive managers and good staff retention with safe practices, but basic activities and irregular supervisions need improvement."
Safety & Risk
8/10
✓
Medicines were managed safely. Staff who supported people with their medicines received regular training. Competency checks were carried out... detailed weekly and monthly checks were completed... Risks to people's health and safety were assessed... Staff had a good understanding about how to raise concerns.
Staff Culture
7/10
✓
Staff spoke about their roles with enthusiasm. They worked well together and demonstrated good teamwork... Staff praised the way the home was run and said they felt involved and included.
Staffing Levels
7/10
✓
People said there were enough staff and they felt safe and secure. Staff confirmed there was enough staff to support people. There were a low turnover of staff and people received consistent and experienced support.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Staff received a range of training... recently undertaken refresher training in a range of topics including mental health conditions... some staff had not received this frequency [of supervisions]. The manager recognised there was work to be done.
Management
8/10
✓
The management team were visible and approachable. We saw there was a warm rapport between the managers, staff and people... Staff praised the way the home was run and said they felt involved and included... 'They [managers] are here all the time. If I go to them they listen and support.'
Programmes
4/10
!
People were supported to be involved in some activities, including maintaining friendships... occasional day trips were planned, outings to the local park and shops... We observed a group of people playing dominoes.
Points to consider
Only basic activities like games, outings, and shopping trips, no activities coordinator or special programmes to make the job more interesting.
People were supported to be involved in some activities... occasional day trips were planned, outings to the local park and shops... We observed a group of people playing dominoes.
Training is standard with refresher courses but supervisions are not always regular enough.
Staff felt well supported and received supervision and appraisal... some staff had not received this frequency. We asked the manager about this who recognised there was work to be done.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: February 2020
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews