Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Staff feel well supported with regular supervision, good training and an open culture, but poor safety from dirty cleaning equipment, weak infection control and missing risk assessments holds it back."
Effective procedures were not in place to prevent the spread of infection. The service was not clean. Equipment used to clean the service was dirty... Risk assessments and care plans were not always in place or did not contain sufficient detail... Medicines management was not always in line with best practice.
Staff felt supported by the management team, they told us they received regular supervision but could access support at any time should they require. Staff felt the management team was approachable which led to an open culture.
There was sufficient staff to meet people's needs. However, the provider did not have a system in place to review staffing levels to ensure these stayed safe. Recruitment records were not always clear when checks had been carried out.
Staff received induction and training; the registered manager was in the process of sourcing external training to improve the training available to staff. Staff told us they received supervisions and felt well supported in their roles.
Governance systems in place had not been effective at identifying areas for improvement. Records were not always in place or in sufficient detail and they had not always been stored safely.
People were supported to participate in activities and their interests. One relative told us, 'They give her activities to do that she likes. They keep her busy.' Another relative told us, 'They take him around the park, He likes the sing along too'
Safety is weak because cleaning equipment is dirty, infection control is poor, risk assessments are often missing or weak, and medication processes are not always safe.
Effective procedures were not in place to prevent the spread of infection. The service was not clean. Equipment used to clean the service was dirty, this included brushes and mops. Risk assessments and care plans were not always in place or did not contain sufficient detail... Medicines that were required to be administered before other medicines had not always been administered separately.
Management oversight is poor because governance checks missed big issues like cleaning problems, safety risks, and record keeping.
Governance systems in place had not been effective at identifying areas for improvement. Although audits took place, they had not always identified or promptly addressed areas found at this inspection. Examples included, concerns related to infection prevention and control, medicines, risk management, window safety, and care planning.
Staff numbers are okay right now but there is no system to keep checking levels stay safe, and hiring records are unclear or dated late.
There was sufficient staff to meet people's needs. However, the provider did not have a system in place to review staffing levels to ensure these stayed safe. Recruitment records were not always clear, and some records were dated after people had commenced employment.
AI Generated
Last inspected: January 2024
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp