Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Stable staffing with time to chat and a supportive culture for staff, but no registered manager and limited activities programmes."
Staff understood the different types of abuse and knew what actions they would need to take in the event of any concerns. People were supported to have their medicines as safely as possible.
All the staff we spoke with were positive the provider's representative and senior staff would address any concerns they may have.
There were enough staff to care for people. One staff member said, 'We are quite lucky, there's always two of us, you have time to chat to people.'
Staff had opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge they needed to support people living at the home.
A registered manager was not in place at the time of our inspection, however, the provider was taking reasonable steps to address this.
People told us they decided what activities they would like to do. Two people told us they had been involved in decisions about what volunteering or paid employment they would like to undertake.
No permanent manager in post at time of inspection, though a new one was starting soon.
A registered manager was not in place at the time of our inspection, however, the provider was taking reasonable steps to address this. A new manager was due to commence employment the week after our inspection.
Only standard training, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff had opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge they needed to support people living at the home.
No activities programme or coordinator, so the role is mostly routine personal care.
People told us staff offered them choices about what care they might like to receive and what they wanted to do.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2018
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp