Working at Clarence Park
7-9 Clarence Road North, Weston Super Mare, BS23 4AT
Operated by N. Notaro Homes Limited
43 bedsNursing homes
Workplace Score
5.6/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 5.6/10
Key Finding
"Staff feel valued with good training and strong safety practices, but unreliable audits and occasional staffing shortages hold it back."
Safety & Risk
7/10
✓
Per 2022 report: All staff received training and followed correct infection control and using PPE processes. The provider ensured staff were compliant with the good practice by carrying out regular spot checks.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff told us that the registered manager welcomed their feedback and ideas for change. Comments from staff included, '[Registered manager's name] is open to ideas and not scared of change if needs be'
Staffing Levels
5/10
!
Per 2022 report: The provider kept their staffing levels under a constant review and ensured appropriate occupancy in line with the people's dependency levels and staff wellbeing.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Staff received induction and ongoing training, those new to health and social care completed the Care Certificate. Staff received regular supervision sessions and these included observations of competency.
Management
4/10
!
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Audits were not consistently used to identify gaps in records. For example, we found that two audits had incorrectly identified that all sections of the record were complete when they were not.
Programmes
6/10
✓
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: The service had recently recruited an Activities Coordinator and activities were in the process of being developed. However, we saw people had been provided with access to meaningful activities.
Points to consider
The management team's audits do not always spot gaps in records, so oversight is not fully reliable.
Audits were not consistently used to identify gaps in records. For example, we found that two audits had incorrectly identified that all sections of the record were complete when they were not.
Staff and residents say there are times with not enough staff, so it feels fast paced and rushed.
feedback from staff members, relatives and people indicated that there were times they felt more staff were required. Comments from staff included, "We need a lot more staff. I'd like to spend more time with them [residents]. It's pretty fast paced."
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: April 2019
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews