Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Staff felt supported with good training and activities, but weak management missed cleaning shortfalls and infection risks."
There were effective safeguarding processes in place. The management team and staff had a good understanding of safeguarding people.
Staff told us they felt supported and valued by the registered manager.
People told us that there were enough staff to support needs and staff responded appropriately when they asked for help.
Staff were competent and knowledgeable and access to training programmes was good to ensure staff were appropriately trained.
The provider did not have an effective management structure. The provider did not monitor the quality of care provided in order to drive improvements and identify any issues that may arise.
An activity co ordinator was employed by the service to provide stimulation and support people.
Managers checks and audits missed problems like poor cleaning and infection risks until outside experts pointed them out.
Management team checks, audits and quality assurance systems failed to identify shortfalls in maintaining the cleanliness, building repairs and infection control concerns at the home.
Short of cleaners for a while so care staff had to do extra cleaning on top of their usual work.
a shortfall in domestic staff had contributed to the building not consistently being cleaned and maintained. One person said, "We have been short of a cleaner and staff had been doing more."
Some unclean areas and damp walls put infection risks on people though now fixed with deep clean.
Some areas of the home were not always clean and in a good condition. For example, some walls in communal areas and the 'games room' were damp.
AI Generated
Last inspected: February 2024
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp