Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Exciting innovative programmes and staff feeling supported with good training, but unsafe medicines management and poor risk monitoring are major concerns."
Medicines were not managed safely; for example, not all ‘when required’ medicines had protocols in place to guide staff how to administer these medicines safely.
Staff told us they felt supported in their role and told us that they could contact the office, which operated an open-door policy, if they had any concerns at all.
The provider had not completed all the required pre-employment checks prior to recruiting staff to ensure only appropriate staff were employed. They had not sought satisfactory evidence of conduct in all relevant previous employment nor verified why the staff members' employment in those positions had ended.
They had a training matrix in place which evidenced most staff had completed their statutory and mandatory training. Staff supervisions were mostly taking place in line with the provider’s policy.
The provider did not operate effective quality and risk monitoring systems and had not identified the shortfalls we found. They had therefore not taken prompt action to reduce the risk these shortfalls posed to people.
One of the most exciting developments underway at our home is our involvement in a pioneering, government-funded 3-year project focused on the development of a fall’s prevention robot.
Medication errors like too-frequent painkillers on 18 days and missing guides for as-needed meds mean safety risks in daily work.
One person was prescribed 2 paracetamol every 4 to 6 hours, records showed there was not always a 4-hour gap between administrations. This occurred on 18 days in April and May 2025. Some ‘when required’ medicines did not always have protocols in place.
Recruitment missed checks on past jobs and reasons staff left them, so you cannot be sure all colleagues are suitable.
The provider had not completed all the required pre-employment checks prior to recruiting staff to ensure only appropriate staff were employed. They had not sought satisfactory evidence of conduct in all relevant previous employment nor verified why the staff members' employment in those positions had ended.
Managers did not spot or fix risks like poor risk assessments and medication issues before the inspection.
The provider did not operate effective quality and risk monitoring systems and had not identified the shortfalls we found. They had therefore not taken prompt action to reduce the risk these shortfalls posed to people.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2025
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp