Last updated: 10 February 2026
"A positive culture where staff feel supported plus meaningful activities, but infection control lapses and weak governance miss key safety risks."
Safe infection prevention and control measures were not consistently followed to help prevent the spread of infection. Risks to people were not always fully assessed, monitored and reviewed.
The provider promoted a positive culture. The provider told us they had an open door policy and staff told us they felt supported. One member of staff told us, "The manager is very good at responding with things especially concerns from staff or resident."
Staffing levels were appropriate and matched the dependency tool being used to match the needs of people at the home. The home used a moderate volume of agency staff.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: Although there were some gaps in staff training records, this had been identified by the registered manager and both training and refresher training had been booked for every member of staff.
Governance and quality assurance procedures and processes were not always effective. They failed to identify issues we found in relation to risk management and IPC practices.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: The service employed a full time activities co-ordinator who facilitated and delivered meaningful activities to people. People were encouraged and supported to be a part of both their local and wider community.
Infection control had issues like missing COVID tests, staff not always wearing gloves and aprons, and dirty bathrooms or equipment, and some risks like choking or weight weren't checked properly.
COVID 19 weekly testing regimes were not always carried out in line with government guidance. Parts of the environment were not kept clean and hygienic and staff did not always wear the correct level of PPE. Risks such as choking, and weight monitoring was not always monitored appropriately.
Oversight and quality checks missed safety problems, and staff supervisions were done poorly with photocopied records and little feedback.
Governance and quality assurance procedures and processes were not always effective. They failed to identify issues we found in relation to risk management and IPC practices. Staff did not have access to an effective supervision system with supervision records duplicated using photocopy versions with little or no recorded discussions or feedback.
Staffing relies on quite a few agency workers so you often work with temps residents don't know well.
The home used a moderate volume of agency staff. Relatives told us that they felt there was a high number of staff they did not recognise.
AI Generated
Last inspected: December 2021
Management Quality
Well-led: Requires improvement
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp